Skip to content
Gnosi-Enorasi

ERP Implementation Assurance

Know Your Build™

The governed assurance layer that maps how an organisation really operates before, during or after an ERP build, so every flow, owner and dependency is declared, confirmed and signed before anyone configures a thing.

Request a demo Explore the platform
Live illustration
2 confirmed 1 finding
Payroll summaryGoods-received notesone side onlyBatch recordsRelease certificatesPurchase budgetProcurementOperationsQAFinanceHR

A simplified illustration of the mutual-declaration rule: a flow is confirmed only when both sides independently declare it. A one-sided flow becomes a finding.

  • Payroll summary

  • Goods-received notes

  • Batch records

  • Release certificates

  • Purchase budget

  • 01 / Vendor-neutral

    SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, Sage, Odoo or any ERP

  • 02 / Deterministic

    the same inputs always give the same findings

  • 03 / Signed

    every record is hash-chained and tamper-evident

The Gap

ERP programmes do not fail on technology. They fail on what nobody wrote down.

68%

of ERP implementations miss their stated objectives

Source / Panorama Consulting, 2025

189%

average cost overrun across enterprise ERP programmes

Source / Panorama Consulting

USD922M+

in litigation claims across 45+ cases over ten years

Source / Gnósi-Enórasi database

Named gap

The Implementation Gap

Between what the business thinks it does and what the system is configured to do sits a gap of knowledge, not of software. It is invisible until go-live, when correcting it costs ten to a hundred times more.

  1. Undocumented information flows

    Who sends what to whom, how often, in what form: held in people’s heads and spreadsheets.

  2. Unassigned ownership

    Records, approvals and master data that everyone uses and nobody owns.

  3. Dependencies found late

    A downstream team discovers it depended on something the new design removes, during UAT.

  4. Implicit governance decisions

    Controls, thresholds and retention rules that exist by habit, not by policy, and vanish in migration.

  5. Workarounds that become permanent

    The temporary Excel bridge on day one is the unsupported integration in year three.

A New Category

Implementation Assurance

A governed layer that sits beside the build, not inside it. It is not an ERP vendor and it is not a consultancy: it is the independent record of what the organisation said it does, confirmed by the people on both sides of every flow.

  1. 01

    Before

    Discover and validate how the organisation actually operates, so the design starts from evidence.

  2. 02

    During

    Hold every change to account: nothing moves after the lock except through governed change management.

  3. 03

    After

    Keep watching: compare live behaviour and SLAs against what was signed.

  • SAP
  • Microsoft
  • Oracle
  • Sage
  • Odoo
  • + any ERP

Vendor-neutral by design. Works with SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, Sage, Odoo, or any ERP.

  • For

    End users

    Know before you build what you are buying, and be able to prove what you asked for.

  • For

    Consultants and integrators

    Replace opinion with a derived, reproducible report and a signed scope that survives a dispute.

  • For

    OEMs

    See, with consent, structured intelligence on how partners’ customisation scope compares with what customers really need.

We are the assurance layer.

How it works

Six stages. One signed record.

  1. Sequential elicitation of information flows, business unit by business unit. What each unit generates, shares and receives, in order, one question at a time.

    Questions open in sequence. A unit that cannot answer produces a co-signed waiver, never a blank.

Innovation

Six mechanisms. Each one a claim.

The engine is built from six mechanisms that define how the record is asked for, compared, governed and signed.

  • CLM-01

    Sequential 3CQ Elicitation

    Three cardinal questions (what do you generate, share, receive) asked in a locked order. You cannot skip ahead or justify an answer retroactively.

  • CLM-02

    Governed Omission Control

    An unanswered question is not a blank. It becomes a permanent, dual-accountability waiver: reason, respondent, countersigner, co-approver.

  • CLM-03

    Mutual-Declaration Dependency Graph

    Every information flow is two independent assertions. The edge exists only when both match; one-sided flows surface as named governance findings.

  • CLM-04

    Pre-Lock Change Management

    Three governed ways to close a gap before the structural lock: propose, defer or escalate, each closed only by written approval.

  • CLM-05

    Multi-Party Approval Gate

    No technical build without client and consultant signatures, with an optional OEM advisory and an automatic notice if none is received.

  • CLM-06

    ERP Native Field Library + DMRA

    Per-vendor field dictionaries mapped onto the dependency graph, with a Data Migration Readiness Assessment run against source extracts.

The platform

The readiness record, derived not declared.

The Transformation Intelligence Report (TIR) is computed from confirmed declarations. Same inputs, same report.

How it works Try the platform

Implementation readiness

Illustrative dashboard.

Readiness

82%0100

Risk

Moderate

SLA

96.4%

Open findings

14

Open
Readiness by function
  • Finance 92
  • Procurement 78
  • Supply Chain 64
  • HR 88
  • Sales 71
readyat riskblocked
Transformation Intelligence ReportColumns A B C D
A / Declared practice

Finance generates the payroll summary monthly

B / Governance requirement

SOP-HR-04 requires a weekly payroll summary

C / The gap

Frequency mismatch: monthly against weekly

D / Target state

Finance commits to weekly in the To-Be

A / Declared practice

Procurement sends goods-received notes to Operations daily

B / Governance requirement

No SLA covers this handover

C / The gap

Operations did not confirm receiving it

D / Target state

Deferred: review in 90 days

Illustrative dashboard. Figures are sample data.

Why We Exist

Built by people who watched it go wrong, repeatedly.

Over a decade of ERP work across SAP, Microsoft, Sage, Odoo and Oracle teaches one lesson: the technology is rarely the cause. The project fails in the gap between what people believe happens and what actually happens, and nobody was ever asked to prove it.

Gnósi-Enórasi turns that gap into a governed record. Not a workshop, not a slide, not an opinion: a derived artefact that two parties can sign and a third can audit.

  • Oreva Pius

    Founder & Chief Product Officer

    NOVA IMS Dean’s Challenge for Innovation Award 2025. More than ten years of ERP implementation experience.

  • Emeka Ogwo

    Co-Founder

    Legal practitioner and project performance governance expert with multi-layer contract management experience.

Validation

  • 01

    Live organisations

    Running with real organisations today.

  • 02

    Real engagements

    Used on live ERP engagements, not demonstrations.

  • 03

    A working platform

    The engine you can sign in and try is the engine we use.

  • 04

    First of its kind

    A methodology with no equivalent in current ERP tooling.

  • 05

    Enterprise applicability

    Built for programmes where evidence matters.

Careers

Build the assurance layer with us.

These roles are the next phase of the team. Each carries real ownership inside live client engagements and the platform itself.

See open roles

Know Your Build™

Declared, confirmed and signed, before anyone configures a thing.

Request a demo [email protected]